Solriamfetol vs Pitolisant: Comparing the Newest Wakefulness-Promoting Agents

Solriamfetol vs Pitolisant

The treatment landscape for narcolepsy-related sleepiness has expanded beyond traditional stimulants. Two notable newer options are Solriamfetol and Pitolisant:

  • Solriamfetol (brand name Sunosi) — a dopamine-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (DNRI)
  • Pitolisant (brand name Wakix) — a histamine H₃ receptor inverse agonist

Though both promote wakefulness, their mechanisms, regulatory status, side effect profiles, and cost-effectiveness vary significantly.

Mechanisms of Action

  • Solriamfetol works by blocking reuptake of dopamine and norepinephrine, increasing concentration of these wakefulness-promoting neurotransmitters. Studies also suggest activity at trace amine receptor TAAR1 adds to its effect.
  • Pitolisant modulates the brain’s histamine system by acting as an inverse agonist at H₃ receptors, enhancing histaminergic activity to promote alertness without typical stimulant mechanisms.

Approved Uses & Regulatory Insights

  • Solriamfetol is approved for narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)-related EDS. It shows effectiveness particularly in OSA patients who need more wakefulness support.
  • Pitolisant is approved for narcolepsy (with or without cataplexy) and has shown effectiveness in improving both EDS and cataplexy symptoms.

Safety Profiles & Side Effects

  • Solriamfetol side effects include headache, nausea, decreased appetite, insomnia, anxiety, and potential cardiovascular effects such as increased heart rate and blood pressure .
  • Pitolisant tends to have a better safety profile, particularly for those with cardiovascular concerns. Its common side effects include insomnia, headache, nausea, and anxiety; rare but serious risks include increased heart rhythm abnormalities.

Efficacy & Cost-Effectiveness

  • Solriamfetol has demonstrated strong efficacy for EDS, and NICE guidelines suggest it may be more cost-effective than pitolisant, especially when other first-line treatments fail .
  • Pitolisant, though not always the most economical, is prized for its non-controlled status in some regions (e.g., the U.S.) and its ability to address cataplexy more directly

Final Comparison Table

FeatureSolriamfetol (Sunosi)Pitolisant (Wakix)
MechanismDNRI (dopamine & norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor)H₃ receptor inverse agonist (boosts histamine)
IndicationsEDS in narcolepsy & OSAEDS & cataplexy in narcolepsy
Onset & DurationFast onset (~2 hrs), half-life ~7 hrsSlower onset (~3 hrs), half-life 10–12 hrs
Side EffectsAppetite loss, anxiety, high BP/HRInsomnia, possible heart rhythm changes
Safety ProfileLess favorable for CV risk patientsBetter CV safety; non-controlled in US
Cost-EffectivenessConsidered more cost-effective by NICEMore expensive but helps with cataplexy

When to Choose Which?

Choose Solriamfetol if:

  • You primarily suffer from EDS due to narcolepsy or OSA.
  • You require rapid, sustained alertness.
  • Cost or cardiovascular considerations are key.

Choose Pitolisant if:

  • Cataplexy is a prominent symptom alongside EDS.
  • You prefer a non-amphetamine pathway with lower CV risk.
  • You’re concerned about controlled substance restrictions or abuse potential.

Resume:

While both solriamfetol and pitolisant represent meaningful advances in narcolepsy treatment, they serve slightly different clinical niches—one offering powerful dopamine-related wakefulness, the other enhancing histaminergic signaling with lower abuse potential and cataplexy control.